Transcript: One thing interesting about the argument that Jan is making in this podcast is, to me, it seems like he just doesn't want it to be the case. Because LLMs can't just go out into the world and make exactly the correct decisions, that they are not able to do this. I mean, they're not online systems, I guess. They're not learning continuously. I think that is a problem. But in the same way, as a baby, I also didn't do that. There was culture and things, and the world responded to me. There was feedback loops. And I think that's more the thing that's missing in some way, is feeding that back. Than necessarily just assuming we have one model now released into the world. And it just matters. And it just magically works. I think maybe that's the case. And maybe I'm just dumb. And that's, yeah, I don't know. Maybe it's a different abstraction of feedback loop. And maybe that's what he's talking about. But it's not clear to me where this specific distinction is in the podcast.
The speaker agrees with Guillaume, who spoke on the Lex Friedman podcast, about the current technology ecosystem fostering polarization and the push for more thoughtful discourse. The speaker also seeks a platform for serious and thoughtful discussion and identifies with Guillaume's perspective. Although there may be other points of disagreement or nuances in opinion, the speaker appreciates Guillaume's nuanced approach and understanding of phonetics. The speaker acknowledges the need to learn from this approach, seeing value in the thoughtfulness and rejecting an outright dismissal of different viewpoints.
The speaker is reflecting on a podcast they listened to with Mark Andreessen discussing media and social landscape, acknowledging the need to participate in social media while also seeking to express themselves beyond current media constraints. They express interest in expanding their visibility, connecting with like-minded individuals, and building a community, despite the challenges of filtering and finding such connections. They mention a desire to make sharing their interests more second nature and express willingness to put themselves out there.
The article discusses the concept of excess energy and its potential for useful work, particularly in the context of desalinization. It raises questions about the economic viability of various forms of useful work and their relationship to industry operations. The author ponders how to accommodate fluctuating energy demand and considers alternative forms of useful work that can be easily adjusted. Additionally, the article delves into the rising energy prices and their implications, noting the impact on inflation and the broader economy. It ultimately questions whether energy prices should be decreasing considering the growing energy supply and highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing energy demand. The author contemplates the impact of a hypothetical surplus of 100 terawatts of power, wondering how it would be utilized in practical applications as well as its potential effect on energy prices. They reflect on the potential implications for the efficiency of semiconductor manufacturing processes and the unit economics of power consumption in relation to chip production. Additionally, they consider the impact on the cost of energy and the potential influence on technological advancements, such as mobile devices and large-language models, while pondering the likelihood of significant developments in battery capacity or power grid capacity in the future. Ultimately, the author grapples with the complex interplay between energy availability, technology development, and economic factors. The text discusses the impact of luck and timing on the future, emphasizing the significance of being in the right place at the right time in an evolving world. The questions revolve around the potential of using increased computing power and its implications for various industries. The author ponders the feasibility of building and networking advanced computational systems, as well as seeking funding opportunities by approaching venture capitalists in Silicon Valley. The text also expresses uncertainty about the timing and feasibility of pursuing these ideas, acknowledging the complexity and challenges involved. The speaker is focused on securing funding for their project and contemplating the core question they are trying to answer. They express a concern about the difficulty of the problem as it exists across various future scenarios and emphasize the need for a computer to understand their context without losing the complexity and emotion of human communication. They mention existing products like Rewind and Tab, but express skepticism about the ease of solving their problem through technology, stating a reluctance to change their behavior to fit a machine's requirements and feeling overwhelmed by the complexity of the task. Despite their doubts, they express a desire to fully realize their vision through a website. The speaker plans to create a new app that will generate a JSON output based on their questions. They believe that having this functionality will enable them to build any app they want. The speaker ends the voice memo with the intention of utilizing the recording for a future project they are working on and suggests that they'll use it to engage in questioning and exploration.
I had a profound two-hour call with Jordan at 9 a.m., discussing a range of topics including the exciting potential of language models, which he called "word calculators." Jordan and I agreed on the importance of solidifying a good intention to create a compelling demo that deeply explores the vision of our project. We also touched on self-expression and the value of using the platform as a "playground" to honestly express oneself without worrying about the audience. Lastly, we delved into the dynamic nature of intentions and how they evolve over time, along with the idea that AI could support individuals by acting as an executive function override during moments of weakness.
82.28% similar
The speaker reflects on a podcast featuring Mark Andreessen on Rick Rubin's show, highlighting Andreessen's enthusiasm for Usenet and its decline after AOL popularized the internet. They consider the potential of small, intelligent social networks to create something meaningful, especially with a few members who have programming skills. The speaker sees the endeavor as a social game that could be enhanced by designing an experience with enough structure to engage people, yet open-ended to allow for personal contributions. Committed to this vision, the speaker expresses a willingness to work tirelessly to refactor their code base, improving it to facilitate collaboration and assist others in the effort.
79.72% similar
The speaker is reflecting on their experience with making audio burrito posts, noting that it often requires multiple attempts to get into the correct mindset—similar to drafting written posts. They're grappling with the challenge of monologuing without a clear understanding of the audience, as they are aware that at least John and CJ will hear it, but uncertainty about the wider audience affects their ability to communicate effectively. This creates a 'contextual membrane shakiness' as the speaker finds the lack of audience boundaries difficult to navigate, which they recognize may vary among different people. The speaker concludes by deciding to end the current note and start a new one.
78.36% similar
The speaker is discussing the principles of social design in the context of creating engaging digital spaces, drawing on the collaborative work with Kristen. They emphasize the importance of social participation, challenges, and focused attention in driving user engagement within a product. Kristen's expertise in designing environments for coherence, sense-making, and collaboration is highlighted, particularly in the transition to digital spaces. The speaker believes that fundamental design elements, like those in a burrito, are critical for crafting unique and compelling user experiences in social design.
77.62% similar
The speaker conveys their frustration with a difficult fundraising experience, describing a particularly unsatisfactory video call with a fund representative. The caller was in a bad mood, hadn't reviewed the provided materials, and hesitated to engage with the product's features. This led to a tense exchange where the speaker challenged the representative's commitment to valuing founders versus purely focusing on financial metrics. Feeling disillusioned, the speaker is left with a distaste for these disengaged "NPCs" and remains focused on their vision of fostering creative and engaging spaces.
76.67% similar
The author contemplates the process of converting an audio note into a transcript, then summarizing it on their "burrito" page. They express a desire to adjust the summarization voice to better represent themselves on the page. Recognizing that this feature may not have widespread appeal, the author nonetheless sees value in providing users with controls to personalize their "burrito." The concept of allowing users to fine-tune their experience is seen as an intriguing possibility.