Transcript: We are not going to be building the killer apps necessarily ourselves. We may build some of them. We may build some of the infrastructure to make the killer apps possible, but it is not really our goal to do that necessarily. Our job is to provide a platform for other people to do that. And this is kind of a big differentiator, as far as I can tell so far, in terms of Humane, Tab, Rewind, Iz. Maybe they pivot this direction, but at the moment, they are giving you an experience that you think you want. And I'm saying, you know what, I don't know what the experience you want is quite yet. And we're going to try to build systems that make it possible for you to have more perfect experience and make it easy for you to tune and make your own experience. What form factor that comes in, no idea yet. I'm sure that with enough people using it in a suboptimal form factor, there's going to be an explosion of a few form factors that work and that don't work. That some people are more tuned to writing, some people are more tuned to talking. Maybe people are tuned to not having either, and maybe their data that they just generate as a byproduct is good enough. And all of these are different things to play with and experiment with. Try to provide as much value through this as possible.
The speaker acknowledges that the ideal form factor for integrating technology into our daily lives is yet to be discovered, with current attempts being preliminary. They express a desire to build the underlying infrastructure that allows various input methods to interface with personal data effectively, likening it to the function of IO devices in computers but extended to human bodies and senses. Recognizing the inevitability of change in technology, they prefer not to commit to a single form factor, instead aiming to create a flexible space that supports a wide array of experiments and inputs. Their vision is to foster an environment that accommodates continuous innovation and supports everyone, without being limited by current design paradigms.
The article discusses the concept of excess energy and its potential for useful work, particularly in the context of desalinization. It raises questions about the economic viability of various forms of useful work and their relationship to industry operations. The author ponders how to accommodate fluctuating energy demand and considers alternative forms of useful work that can be easily adjusted. Additionally, the article delves into the rising energy prices and their implications, noting the impact on inflation and the broader economy. It ultimately questions whether energy prices should be decreasing considering the growing energy supply and highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing energy demand. The author contemplates the impact of a hypothetical surplus of 100 terawatts of power, wondering how it would be utilized in practical applications as well as its potential effect on energy prices. They reflect on the potential implications for the efficiency of semiconductor manufacturing processes and the unit economics of power consumption in relation to chip production. Additionally, they consider the impact on the cost of energy and the potential influence on technological advancements, such as mobile devices and large-language models, while pondering the likelihood of significant developments in battery capacity or power grid capacity in the future. Ultimately, the author grapples with the complex interplay between energy availability, technology development, and economic factors. The text discusses the impact of luck and timing on the future, emphasizing the significance of being in the right place at the right time in an evolving world. The questions revolve around the potential of using increased computing power and its implications for various industries. The author ponders the feasibility of building and networking advanced computational systems, as well as seeking funding opportunities by approaching venture capitalists in Silicon Valley. The text also expresses uncertainty about the timing and feasibility of pursuing these ideas, acknowledging the complexity and challenges involved. The speaker is focused on securing funding for their project and contemplating the core question they are trying to answer. They express a concern about the difficulty of the problem as it exists across various future scenarios and emphasize the need for a computer to understand their context without losing the complexity and emotion of human communication. They mention existing products like Rewind and Tab, but express skepticism about the ease of solving their problem through technology, stating a reluctance to change their behavior to fit a machine's requirements and feeling overwhelmed by the complexity of the task. Despite their doubts, they express a desire to fully realize their vision through a website. The speaker plans to create a new app that will generate a JSON output based on their questions. They believe that having this functionality will enable them to build any app they want. The speaker ends the voice memo with the intention of utilizing the recording for a future project they are working on and suggests that they'll use it to engage in questioning and exploration.
85.08% similar
The speaker is excited about tomorrow but acknowledges that as a developer facing new challenges, the work is not trivial, especially given the lack of extensive documentation and the solitary nature of their current work process. They express a desire to share their learnings, possibly by writing them down, and emphasize the importance of collaboration, suggesting that "if we do this together, it will be a better world." The speaker is tired of creating misleadingly impressive demos and aims to write code and interact with large language models in a more genuine and transparent way. Lastly, they recognize the complexity of building an effective agential system, admitting their current limitations while believing in its importance, and they present open questions about processing and connecting large amounts of data to better understand who we are.
The speaker reflects on the customer-focused approach of TSMC and its importance in business, while also discussing a personal struggle with balancing self-focus and advancing the interests of others. They find satisfaction in moving the ball forward for other people and are working to create tools that fulfill initial promises and improve ease of use. The "burrito project" mentioned seems to involve creating fundamental tools, exploring AI, and making computer tools more accessible, highlighting the magic and potential of fetching personal data with simple requests.
84.91% similar
The speaker emphasizes their unique strategy regarding AI, recognizing the existing interest in such pervasive technology and its demonstrated potential. They argue that success in this field isn't solely about attractive designs but also about hiring the best engineering talent to make technological advancements possible. Acknowledging their own limitations, the speaker notes the importance of fundamental technology developed by their friends and the need for substantial technological work, implying that simple technology orchestration is not enough for sustained success. Despite the rambling nature of their thoughts, the speaker seems to aim for a blend of business and consumer offerings, driven by core technological innovation and top engineering expertise.