Transcript: The next bit of writing has to do with, I don't think we have found a form factor yet for how this is going to operate in someone's life. I think Avi and Tab and the Humane thing and all of this is our first ditch attempt at making a system like this. But what I think is, well, I want to build the underlying infrastructure that makes those things possible. At the end of the day, those things are input methods. And I want to be able to support a broad range of input methods and hopefully in a very relatively small API space. The kernel for your personal data. And just like we have IO devices and things like that in computers, now this is extending it to our bodies and our senses. And I think that that definitely will need to be covered and probably can be covered quite simply. And it'll take experimentation to get there, but I think we can do it. And given that, yeah, where I want to play is, I want to support everything and everyone. I don't need to take a strong opinion on what the form factor is going to be right now, because it will change in six months. It will change in a year and a half. I would rather create the space that affords many different experiments to evolve and not get sucked into one or the other. And that is part of what I would like to create.
We aim to create a versatile platform that enables others to develop killer apps, rather than focusing on creating these applications ourselves. While companies like Humane, Tab, and Rewind are curating user experiences, our approach is to build systems that allow users to craft their ideal experience. We recognize that the optimal form factor for our platform is yet to be determined and will evolve as users interact with it in various ways. Our commitment is to experimental exploration, allowing for personalization, whether through writing, speaking, or passive data generation, to deliver the greatest possible value.
86.19% similar
The author emphasizes the need for personal AI to be holistic and know a fair bit about the user to answer complex questions. They express skepticism about current devices like Tab and Rewind catching on but foresee their eventual adoption. They ponder the societal implications of pervasive surveillance and advocate for thoughtful consideration. The author envisions using an AI system to capture and analyze their conversations at home to elucidate thinking patterns and make them accessible. Additionally, they discuss the limitations of vector algorithms in representing complex questions and suggest the need for a new approach. The speaker suggests that while their idea is a starting point, further exploration is necessary to determine its relevance and significance. They reflect on the process of developing a deeper understanding and consider the practical aspects of implementing their thoughts about how the brain is constructed.
The main points discussed in the text are the concept of a secure second brain for storing and sharing information, the importance of creating modular and composable systems for higher order modules and abstractions, the need for brain introspection tools to interact with and inspect the stored information, and the idea of interoperability to facilitate communication and collaboration between different brains. Additionally, there is a mention of potential open source offerings and hosted options for running the system, as well as the possibility of developing hardware to make self-running more feasible in the future.
The writer expresses enthusiasm for the potential of recent technological advancements, specifically with regard to enhancing individual engagement and benefit rather than corporate application. They believe in the potential of mobile devices to run large language models, ultimately changing how individuals interact with computers and information. They draw parallels between early computing and the current focus on corporate-oriented technology, expressing a preference for the democratization of such capabilities. The writer feels optimistic about the direction of technology and its potential for widespread value, despite current perceptions.
85.27% similar
The speaker emphasizes their unique strategy regarding AI, recognizing the existing interest in such pervasive technology and its demonstrated potential. They argue that success in this field isn't solely about attractive designs but also about hiring the best engineering talent to make technological advancements possible. Acknowledging their own limitations, the speaker notes the importance of fundamental technology developed by their friends and the need for substantial technological work, implying that simple technology orchestration is not enough for sustained success. Despite the rambling nature of their thoughts, the speaker seems to aim for a blend of business and consumer offerings, driven by core technological innovation and top engineering expertise.
84.13% similar
The speaker is discussing the principles of social design in the context of creating engaging digital spaces, drawing on the collaborative work with Kristen. They emphasize the importance of social participation, challenges, and focused attention in driving user engagement within a product. Kristen's expertise in designing environments for coherence, sense-making, and collaboration is highlighted, particularly in the transition to digital spaces. The speaker believes that fundamental design elements, like those in a burrito, are critical for crafting unique and compelling user experiences in social design.
82.38% similar
The author contemplates the process of converting an audio note into a transcript, then summarizing it on their "burrito" page. They express a desire to adjust the summarization voice to better represent themselves on the page. Recognizing that this feature may not have widespread appeal, the author nonetheless sees value in providing users with controls to personalize their "burrito." The concept of allowing users to fine-tune their experience is seen as an intriguing possibility.
81.14% similar
The speaker is reflecting on their experience with making audio burrito posts, noting that it often requires multiple attempts to get into the correct mindset—similar to drafting written posts. They're grappling with the challenge of monologuing without a clear understanding of the audience, as they are aware that at least John and CJ will hear it, but uncertainty about the wider audience affects their ability to communicate effectively. This creates a 'contextual membrane shakiness' as the speaker finds the lack of audience boundaries difficult to navigate, which they recognize may vary among different people. The speaker concludes by deciding to end the current note and start a new one.
79.58% similar
I've always been drawn to the peculiar and unexplored, which makes me wonder if I can pepper my writing with a bit of the offbeat—things that don't quite fit the mold. Question is, can I make it work? Ditching the third-person narrative and opting for a chat with you in the first person could make my stories feel more intimate, more like we're in this together. And hey, isn't that what storytelling's all about? Let's find out.
79.07% similar
Pascal, from Brooklyn, is excited to engage with a new social network and a burrito he just tried. He's currently experiencing winter weather and has consumed a weed gummy before diving into work on the Tanaki app with multiplayer live video features. He plans to get a massage to unwind physically and mentally. Pascal hopes for a feature that enables connection with his audience to avoid feeling isolated and looks forward to interacting with others on the platform.