cj

The writer expresses enthusiasm for the potential of recent technological advancements, specifically with regard to enhancing individual engagement and benefit rather than corporate application. They believe in the potential of mobile devices to run large language models, ultimately changing how individuals interact with computers and information. They draw parallels between early computing and the current focus on corporate-oriented technology, expressing a preference for the democratization of such capabilities. The writer feels optimistic about the direction of technology and its potential for widespread value, despite current perceptions.

The speaker discusses an anecdote about a cancer patient seeking advice from a chatbot, noting that while the AI can offer generic suggestions, it lacks personal context. The friend wonders why the AI doesn't specifically suggest contacting Chiaki, emphasizing the expectation that computers should understand users. The speaker suggests that developing AI with personal knowledge and understanding may better address such needs, highlighting the demand for personalized AI solutions. They propose creating an AI "brain" with contextual modules, referencing the existing consumer interest in this capability as evidence of its potential use.

The writer discusses the contrast between ownership and rental, noting that ownership usually represents a capital asset while renting is just an expense. The consideration of owning versus renting becomes relevant when ownership is cost-effective compared to renting. The writer questions the economic implications of owning technology, such as gaming PCs, and how certain technologies may not qualify as capital assets due to depreciation. The discussion then shifts to the potential development of a dedicated chip, such as a GPT-4 ASIC, and the feasibility of widespread adoption and cost-efficiency compared to cloud services. Ultimately, the writer expresses a preference for ownership over renting, as it provides leverage in the world, particularly in relation to valuable tech companies that own the IP and computational resources for large language models. The text reflects on the potential commoditization of computing resources and its impact on the industry. The speaker believes that compute resources will inevitably become commoditized, presenting challenges and opportunities for those involved. The discussion also touches on the shift from cloud-based subscriptions to hardware ownership as a response to commoditization. Additionally, there are considerations about the storage and computing landscape, particularly regarding the efficiency of capital allocation. The passage raises significant questions about the impact of commoditization on both personal and large-scale computing, emphasizing the need for further analysis and collaboration to address these complex issues.