Comment: deleted from twitter, mainly because i want to test more with gemini 1.5 before explicitly making criticism. however i do notice shortcomings in gpt4 right now. the internet tends to like hype and not always the reality of how something works. or maybe i dont know shit
Caption: Reflecting on the challenges and nuances of benchmarking language models with personal data
Description: The content shows three separate tweets from a Twitter user with the handle @cj_pais. The tweets express thoughts about benchmarking context windows for language models and mention a metaphorical 'needle in a haystack' approach. The user discusses experiences with inputting personal data into GPT4, noting failures when the language model processes large amounts of data at once. They observe better results when breaking down the problem into smaller chunks. Possible issues with GPT's handling of JSON versus plaintext are also mentioned, and the user suggests defining tasks more concretely for benchmarking purposes.Extracted Text
cj @cj_pais
i think benchmarking context windows with the "needle in a haystack" approach is a good first step, but needs improvement
specifically, i want the LLM to be able to cognize over the context window, not just pull a fact out
1
57
cj @cj_pais
i notice failures when giving GPT4 a large amount of my personal data and asking: "what did i eat every day this week"
breaking the problem down into smaller chunks and feeding into context window has near perfect results, but doing it all at once get's 4/7 days
1
22
cj @cj_pais
perhaps gpt's understanding of json is worse than plaintext which is leading to this result
i would like to define this task more concretely to be able to benchmark for it. the needle in a haystack is brilliant in because its very easy to benchmark
1
17
In envisioning an ideal way to integrate new log entries, the goal is to place each entry within the larger context of the whole, which may be an iterative process to determine that context. The author contemplates whether incorporating various data sources into a language model like GPT-4 could help it understand the overarching themes of communications, such as text messages. They propose an experimental approach by loading as much context as possible into the model whenever a new input is received, maximizing the token limit to allow the model to contextualize new information based on previous entries. This method, which involves brute forcing context into the AI's understanding, could potentially be a valuable asynchronous step in refining the pipeline for more nuanced contextual analysis.
85.15% similar
The individual has discovered that working backward from a desired result with a large language model is surprisingly effective, especially when detailing the problem forward seems challenging. This backward approach has simplified the problem and resulted in the use of GPT-4 for data transformation within the context window, improving the process. An automatic metadata generation pipeline is emerging, where data transformations are added as needed, potentially storing transformations for future use based on query relevance. This system will generate an extensive amount of synthetic data, allowing for the extraction of relevant information through queries fed into the model at later stages, rather than having to pre-determine all questions.
The writer expresses enthusiasm for the potential of recent technological advancements, specifically with regard to enhancing individual engagement and benefit rather than corporate application. They believe in the potential of mobile devices to run large language models, ultimately changing how individuals interact with computers and information. They draw parallels between early computing and the current focus on corporate-oriented technology, expressing a preference for the democratization of such capabilities. The writer feels optimistic about the direction of technology and its potential for widespread value, despite current perceptions.
The speaker aspires to be part of communities that empower individuals to explore their data and bring value back to themselves. They are willing to take a job in such a space and believe it's worth doing. The goal is to build tools that make it easy for the individual to work with their data directly on a web page. They plan to move to a more reactive front end using Next.js and React, designing a feed and query system possibly using natural language. The speaker also mentions working on embedding audio and ensuring embeddings are accessible. The text discusses the process of obtaining and manipulating data and emphasizes the importance of experimentation and innovation. It uses the metaphor of building a playground to illustrate the iterative nature of the process, acknowledging that initial attempts may be imperfect but can be improved upon through learning from mistakes. The writer anticipates challenges but expresses a hope to avoid negative consequences and eventually achieve success. Finally, the text concludes with a lighthearted remark and a reference to going to sleep.
The speaker is considering the research question of how to achieve distributed compute, particularly the need for parallelism in executing pipelines and AI agents. They question the potential for building a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) that allows for agents to dynamically contribute to it and execute in parallel, emphasizing the need for pipeline development to accommodate this level of complexity. The discussion also touches on the scalability and parallel execution potential of the mixture of experts model, such as GPT-4, and the potential for hierarchical or vector space implementation. The speaker is keen on exploring the level of parallelism achievable through mixture of experts but acknowledges the limited understanding of its full capabilities at this point. They also express curiosity about fine-tuning experts for personal data. The speaker is discussing the data they are generating and the value of the training data for their system, particularly emphasizing the importance of transforming the data to suit their context and actions. They mention meditating and recording their thoughts, which they intend to transform into a bullet point list using an AI model after running it through a pipeline. The individual also discusses making their data publicly accessible and considering using GPT (possibly GPT-3) to post summaries of their thoughts on Twitter. They also ponder the potential of using machine learning models to create a personal Google-like system for individual data. The text discusses using data chunking as a method for generating backlinks and implementing PageRank in an agent system. It mentions steep space models and the continuous updating of internal state during training. It also compares the level of context in transformer models and discusses the idea of transformer as a compression of knowledge in a language. The speaker expresses interest in understanding the concept of decay in relation to memory and its impact on the storage and retrieval of information. They draw parallels between the processing of information in their mind and the functioning of a transformer model, with the long-term memory being likened to a transformer and short-term memory to online processing. They speculate on the potential of augmenting the transformer model with synthetic training data to improve long-term context retention and recall. Additionally, they mention a desire to leverage a state space model to compile a list of movies recommended by friends and contemplate the symbiotic relationship between technology and human sensory inputs in the future. In this passage, the speaker reflects on the relationship between humans and computers, suggesting that a form of symbiosis already exists between the two. They acknowledge the reliance on technology and the interconnectedness of biological and computational intelligence, viewing them as mutually beneficial and likening the relationship to symbiosis in nature. They express a preference for living at the juxtaposition of humans and computers, while acknowledging the potential challenges and the need to address potential risks. Additionally, they mention that their thoughts on this topic have been influenced by their experiences with psychedelics. The speaker discusses the potential increase in computing power over the next five years, mentioning the impact of Moore's Law and advancements in lithography and semiconductors. They refer to the semiconductor roadmap up to 2034, highlighting the shift towards smaller measurements, such as angstroms, for increased transistor density. They emphasize that the nanometer measurements are based on nomenclature rather than actual transistor size, and the challenges in increasing density due to size limitations and cost constraints. The conversation touches on different companies' approaches to transistor density and the role of ASML in pushing lithography boundaries, before concluding with a reference to the high cost and potential decline in revenue for semiconductor production. The speaker discusses the importance of semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. and China's significant focus in this area. They mention watching videos and reading sub stacks related to semiconductor technology, specifically referencing industry analysts and experts in the field. The speaker expresses enthusiasm for staying updated on developments and offers to share information with the listener. The conversation concludes with a friendly farewell and the possibility of future discussions.
82.63% similar
The speaker describes their experience of partially understanding a podcast, particularly a term "Socratic search space," while on a walk and expresses a desire to delve deeper into its meaning. They prefer an interactive approach where they can ask a device to provide references and contextual explanations, as opposed to receiving a summary generated by an AI model like GPT, which might lack the most recent uses of the term. They are skeptical about the capability of language models to provide a comprehensive understanding, given that they might not recognize terms with minimal occurrences in training data. The speaker envisions a system that could compile and present relevant information in a coherent way, enhancing their grasp of the podcast's content and making the learning process more meaningful.
81.76% similar
81.16% similar
The speaker is contemplating how to ensure a substrate recognizes the relationship between two related but unlinked entries. They consider whether to trust the system's ability to connect them or address the issue using the Cray layer. The role of metadata is questioned; whether it could enhance the process or complicate it. Ultimately, the speaker is weighing the benefits of a simpler approach against a more complex but precise one.
80.43% similar
The speaker is reflecting on their experience with making audio burrito posts, noting that it often requires multiple attempts to get into the correct mindset—similar to drafting written posts. They're grappling with the challenge of monologuing without a clear understanding of the audience, as they are aware that at least John and CJ will hear it, but uncertainty about the wider audience affects their ability to communicate effectively. This creates a 'contextual membrane shakiness' as the speaker finds the lack of audience boundaries difficult to navigate, which they recognize may vary among different people. The speaker concludes by deciding to end the current note and start a new one.
79.92% similar
The text provides insights into the challenges of finalizing and shipping a product, highlighting the complexities of resetting and managing various states and default values. It also touches on the need to consider potential issues and the importance of thorough testing. The author reflects on potential improvements for future projects, such as incorporating safeguards for duplicate signatures and considering time-based randomization. Additionally, the text emphasizes the importance of attention to detail, particularly in visual aspects, during the final stages of development and deployment. The speaker discusses their increasing comfort with refactoring and componentizing complex structures. They express excitement about making code more readable and coherent, although the components are currently specific to the project. The speaker notes the trade-off between using brain cycles to save CPU cycles and vice versa, while also reflecting on past regrets and lessons learned. They emphasize the importance of simplifying and automating processes to reduce complexity and potential confusion. Additionally, they mention the need to minimize the number of possible states to maintain control and avoid tangled situations. The text contains various thoughts on working with render loops and passing signals as props in React components. The author also discusses the importance of validating metadata before deployment in order to avoid costly mistakes on the main net. Additionally, the author reflects on the need for breaks during long coding sessions and the frustration of having to rename components. Overall, the text reflects the author's experiences and insights while working on a project.