Transcript: I am in the process of thinking about a module system for the brain. That is, right now we have effectively one, well, we'll call it two modules of different hierarchies or orders. The first module is the audio file handler. That is, when we submit an audio file, some things happen as a result of that. The module that we run on top of it, well, I guess there's a couple, potentially, that we run on top of it. One is the summarization module. Just to get a summary of that audio, something really simple, concise, and lets you glance at it. That's as simple as it is for now. But in the future, it's possible that people will want to implement their own modules. Right now, it won't go that far as to have other people implement their own modules, but it will make my process of writing new modules much easier, and from there, we can begin to think about how others may implement them in the future. But given this, to make the process easier, I have two suggested modules that I'm curious about. The first is a module called questions. Questions is a module that takes the text and tries to extract any salient questions from it. This module may be extended in the future, but for now, that's all it will try and do, is make a list of questions. Maybe in JSON format, maybe not. Who knows? For now, it's a first attempt. So that's one module I'd like to add. There's another module that I'd like to add, which is another kind of feature extraction module, which is like what the questions is. It's extracting questions from the thing. And it may return nothing as well, and that's totally okay. The second one is a feature extraction module called people. We want to extract names and people from the text. This probably will come in very handy in the future. Exactly what that looks like right now, don't know. But I can imagine queries of that being very relevant. And that can be with inside the data or not. And perhaps even there's an entire higher order module called people that this attends to, that the brain is aware of all of the other modules that may be impacted as a result of something going in. And likely, because these modules are all aware of each other, we have to set some recursive depth limit on all of them. That is if they are constantly updating each other in result, what is to stop that going on for infinity? That is precisely the problem. We will probably limit it to three. Depth of three. Or four or five or something. Something fairly low. So it impacts the modules that are primary first. And anyhow, yes, this is just an overview of kind of what I am thinking. And it's also partially a test to make sure the cleanup that I did works nicely.
The personal AI becomes an application platform, allowing users to ask it to plan activities and perform additional tasks such as feature and metadata extraction. Through understanding the user's preferences and reaching out to the internet for relevant information, the AI can propose personalized weekly plans and communicate between other users' AI systems. This approach provides a customizable and beneficial tool for personal growth, making tasks more efficient and offering the potential for improved connections between individuals.
The main points discussed in the text are the concept of a secure second brain for storing and sharing information, the importance of creating modular and composable systems for higher order modules and abstractions, the need for brain introspection tools to interact with and inspect the stored information, and the idea of interoperability to facilitate communication and collaboration between different brains. Additionally, there is a mention of potential open source offerings and hosted options for running the system, as well as the possibility of developing hardware to make self-running more feasible in the future.
84.98% similar
The writer is contemplating the organization of a digital resource for their trip, considering creating a separate space to detail their experiences with a friend. They also express a desire to display photos and other content in a unique manner, possibly by creating a separate "artifact" of the trip. The writer is interested in using this digital resource as a platform to ask and answer questions about their trip experiences, possibly turning these into website content. Overall, the writer is considering how to effectively document their trip and capture their experiences. They express the intention to share more about this project through a video and to organize their thoughts about it on GitHub. Additionally, they are considering the development of a to-do list module for this project.
The speaker aspires to be part of communities that empower individuals to explore their data and bring value back to themselves. They are willing to take a job in such a space and believe it's worth doing. The goal is to build tools that make it easy for the individual to work with their data directly on a web page. They plan to move to a more reactive front end using Next.js and React, designing a feed and query system possibly using natural language. The speaker also mentions working on embedding audio and ensuring embeddings are accessible. The text discusses the process of obtaining and manipulating data and emphasizes the importance of experimentation and innovation. It uses the metaphor of building a playground to illustrate the iterative nature of the process, acknowledging that initial attempts may be imperfect but can be improved upon through learning from mistakes. The writer anticipates challenges but expresses a hope to avoid negative consequences and eventually achieve success. Finally, the text concludes with a lighthearted remark and a reference to going to sleep.
84.13% similar
The author emphasizes the need for personal AI to be holistic and know a fair bit about the user to answer complex questions. They express skepticism about current devices like Tab and Rewind catching on but foresee their eventual adoption. They ponder the societal implications of pervasive surveillance and advocate for thoughtful consideration. The author envisions using an AI system to capture and analyze their conversations at home to elucidate thinking patterns and make them accessible. Additionally, they discuss the limitations of vector algorithms in representing complex questions and suggest the need for a new approach. The speaker suggests that while their idea is a starting point, further exploration is necessary to determine its relevance and significance. They reflect on the process of developing a deeper understanding and consider the practical aspects of implementing their thoughts about how the brain is constructed.
82.99% similar
The author contemplates the process of converting an audio note into a transcript, then summarizing it on their "burrito" page. They express a desire to adjust the summarization voice to better represent themselves on the page. Recognizing that this feature may not have widespread appeal, the author nonetheless sees value in providing users with controls to personalize their "burrito." The concept of allowing users to fine-tune their experience is seen as an intriguing possibility.
81.37% similar
The speaker is reflecting on their experience with making audio burrito posts, noting that it often requires multiple attempts to get into the correct mindset—similar to drafting written posts. They're grappling with the challenge of monologuing without a clear understanding of the audience, as they are aware that at least John and CJ will hear it, but uncertainty about the wider audience affects their ability to communicate effectively. This creates a 'contextual membrane shakiness' as the speaker finds the lack of audience boundaries difficult to navigate, which they recognize may vary among different people. The speaker concludes by deciding to end the current note and start a new one.
77.72% similar
I've always been drawn to the peculiar and unexplored, which makes me wonder if I can pepper my writing with a bit of the offbeat—things that don't quite fit the mold. Question is, can I make it work? Ditching the third-person narrative and opting for a chat with you in the first person could make my stories feel more intimate, more like we're in this together. And hey, isn't that what storytelling's all about? Let's find out.
77.30% similar
The speaker is discussing the principles of social design in the context of creating engaging digital spaces, drawing on the collaborative work with Kristen. They emphasize the importance of social participation, challenges, and focused attention in driving user engagement within a product. Kristen's expertise in designing environments for coherence, sense-making, and collaboration is highlighted, particularly in the transition to digital spaces. The speaker believes that fundamental design elements, like those in a burrito, are critical for crafting unique and compelling user experiences in social design.
76.27% similar
The speaker conveys their frustration with a difficult fundraising experience, describing a particularly unsatisfactory video call with a fund representative. The caller was in a bad mood, hadn't reviewed the provided materials, and hesitated to engage with the product's features. This led to a tense exchange where the speaker challenged the representative's commitment to valuing founders versus purely focusing on financial metrics. Feeling disillusioned, the speaker is left with a distaste for these disengaged "NPCs" and remains focused on their vision of fostering creative and engaging spaces.